-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[OTEL-2147] add methods for converter ocb compatibility #31009
[OTEL-2147] add methods for converter ocb compatibility #31009
Conversation
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=48943485 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit c1f36d7 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 043922b Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | +3.47 | [-0.01, +6.94] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | +1.01 | [+0.32, +1.70] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.16 | [-0.08, +0.40] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.14, +0.25] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.49, +0.51] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.32, +0.34] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.10, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.15 | [-0.24, -0.07] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.17 | [-0.29, -0.05] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -0.17 | [-3.87, +3.53] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.37 | [-0.85, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | egress throughput | -0.47 | [-0.95, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.57 | [-0.61, -0.52] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | -0.65 | [-1.37, +0.07] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.81 | [-0.90, -0.71] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
---|---|---|---|---|
❌ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 8/10 | |
❌ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 8/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
f134dd9
to
c1f36d7
Compare
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
/merge |
Devflow running:
|
What does this PR do?
adds required methods so that otelcol/converter can be included and built with ocb
Motivation
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/OTEL-2236
Describe how to test/QA your changes
**Note: testing this is currently blocked by open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector#11649; you can apply the changes in the linked PR/issue to ocb yourself or just wait until that PR is accepted
download latest ocb and build from source
download an ocb manifest
$ wget https://test2-for-worker.haf208.cc/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/refs/heads/main/distributions/otelcol-contrib/manifest.yaml
add the following lines to add the converter to manifest.yaml:
download a config file to test your collector
wget https://test2-for-worker.haf208.cc/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-collector-releases/refs/heads/main/distributions/otelcol-contrib/config.yaml
delete any sections from config.yaml referencing extensions "zpages", "pprof", or "healthcheck" (we need to make sure converter adds them back into the configuration)
build and run your custom collector
send test command in a new terminal window to verify configuration was modified
$ curl -k https://localhost:7777
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
cannot push automated test until upstream change is merged, JIRA card for this: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/OTEL-2238
Additional Notes