Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2020. It is now read-only.

Add support for Windows #334

Open
heitortsergent opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 36 comments
Open

Add support for Windows #334

heitortsergent opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 36 comments

Comments

@heitortsergent
Copy link
Contributor

Opening this issue so we can track interest. :)

@rschalch
Copy link

+1 !

@pauloelr
Copy link
Contributor

👍

6 similar comments
@dennissherman
Copy link

+1

@And-re
Copy link

And-re commented Jun 29, 2015

+1

@serveace
Copy link

👍

@renanmpimentel
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@claudiocp
Copy link

+1

@d7h
Copy link

d7h commented Oct 26, 2015

+1

@Djamy
Copy link

Djamy commented Oct 27, 2015

+1 !

@tandre-cit
Copy link

👍

@annielmenezes
Copy link

It's cool 👍

@matheuslc
Copy link

+1

1 similar comment
@gjr-qm
Copy link

gjr-qm commented Nov 8, 2015

+1

@ezra-en
Copy link

ezra-en commented Nov 10, 2015

+1!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 10, 2015

+1

1 similar comment
@FDiskas
Copy link

FDiskas commented Dec 16, 2015

+1

@mattwoolnough
Copy link

👍

@davidvrsantos
Copy link

image

@bruno-schmidt
Copy link

+1

@nuxlli
Copy link
Member

nuxlli commented Jan 11, 2016

There's no lack of will to build a Windows version of azk, but there are three main issues that are making things harder (from the most important to the least important):

The first issue is still an open issue. I think the most likely solution will be to write some kind of Windows kernel extension or driver, as we've done to Linux.

About the second one, there're still hope once Microsoft has supported the use of terminal on Windows and things such as Powershell are exciting us. Anyhow, we can also work with Cygwin or even clink.

Finally, about the third issue, however VirtualBox has been the chosen virtualization solution for Mac OS X, we know its limitations (mainly related to file sharing). As our motto is to make azk distribution as simple as possible, we've been studying the use of xhyve for Mac OS X.

For Windows, we've made recent progress when we found out that some people are successfully using QEMU Binaries to run Docker on Windows \o/

Well, this is an update about the current status and researches on azk for Windows.

@juradoz
Copy link

juradoz commented Jan 13, 2016

+1

7 similar comments
@rafawhs
Copy link

rafawhs commented Jan 14, 2016

+1

@lira92
Copy link

lira92 commented Jan 21, 2016

+1

@heitorsilva
Copy link

+1

@Dayvisson
Copy link

+1

@movibe
Copy link

movibe commented Mar 8, 2016

+1

@mikestaub
Copy link

+1

@renatoassis01
Copy link

+1

@AdrianoCahete
Copy link

Please, use reactions button to vote.

@FDiskas
Copy link

FDiskas commented May 7, 2016

+1

@FDiskas
Copy link

FDiskas commented May 7, 2016

curl -Ls http://azk.io/install.sh | bash
[azk] [ERROR] Cannot detect the current platform.

:(

@rodrigoscna
Copy link

Are there any updates on this now that Docker is on Release Candidate for "full" Windows support?

@skellytt
Copy link

Seeing that Docker for Windows is now generally available for production, how are the plans for azu on Windows? | https://blog.docker.com/2016/07/docker-for-mac-and-windows-production-ready

@FDiskas
Copy link

FDiskas commented Sep 7, 2016

any news?

@armand1m
Copy link

+1. Also, there is any interests in exploring the feature possibilities using Docker for Windows and Windows Containers? I've not been using it but seems very promising.

@martemorfosis
Copy link

Any news on this?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests